Longboys decision board
Player Value blends absolute ESPN projection strength with within-position standing, so a thin waiver pool no longer makes every top available player look elite.
Raw Δ is incoming Player Value minus the named drop candidate. Roster fit is the explicit positional adjustment. Net Δ is what drives Claim/Watch/Ignore.
Ignore
Isiah Pacheco
RB · 8 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
7.3
(8.2)
Season
213.8
(150.2)
Value
82
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
+3.0
Pros
- Season projection +63.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value gain of +8.0
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 82.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- +8.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- +3.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- Romeo Doubs
- Week projection
- 7.3
- Season projection
- 213.8
- ESPN rostered
- 39.9%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 82 vs Romeo Doubs retention 74 (+8.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 82.4
- Raw Δ
- +8.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- +3.0
- UI fit score
- 53.0
Ignore
Dylan Sampson
RB · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
5.0
(8.2)
Season
199.2
(150.2)
Value
76
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-4.0
Pros
- Season projection +49.0 versus comparison player
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 75.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- +1.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -4.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 5.0
- Season projection
- 199.2
- ESPN rostered
- 9.0%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 75 vs — retention 74 (+1.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 75.5
- Raw Δ
- +1.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -4.0
- UI fit score
- 46.0
Ignore
Tyrone Tracy Jr.
RB · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.0
(8.2)
Season
206.9
(150.2)
Value
75
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-4.9
Pros
- Season projection +56.7 versus comparison player
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 74.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- +0.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -4.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.0
- Season projection
- 206.9
- ESPN rostered
- 16.1%
- Historical board
- 123
Debug / model details
live value 75 vs — retention 74 (+0.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 74.6
- Raw Δ
- +0.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -4.9
- UI fit score
- 45.1
Ignore
James Conner
RB · 22 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
250.2
(150.2)
Value
68
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-11.5
Pros
- Season projection +100.0 versus comparison player
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Raw player-value loss of -6.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 68.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -6.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -11.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 250.2
- ESPN rostered
- 4.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 68 vs — retention 74 (-6.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 68.0
- Raw Δ
- -6.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -11.5
- UI fit score
- 38.5
Ignore
Justice Hill
RB · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
6.8
(8.2)
Season
114.2
(150.2)
Value
67
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-12.9
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -1.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -36.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -7.9
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 66.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -7.9
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -12.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 6.8
- Season projection
- 114.2
- ESPN rostered
- 8.2%
- Historical board
- 138
Debug / model details
live value 67 vs — retention 74 (-7.9 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 66.6
- Raw Δ
- -7.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -12.9
- UI fit score
- 37.1
Ignore
Samaje Perine
RB · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
5.9
(8.2)
Season
100.5
(150.2)
Value
62
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-17.1
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -2.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -49.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -12.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 62.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -12.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -17.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 5.9
- Season projection
- 100.5
- ESPN rostered
- 3.5%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 62 vs — retention 74 (-12.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 62.4
- Raw Δ
- -12.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -17.1
- UI fit score
- 32.9
Ignore
Keaton Mitchell
RB · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
6.2
(8.2)
Season
93.9
(150.2)
Value
62
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-17.3
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -2.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -56.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -12.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 62.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -12.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -17.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 6.2
- Season projection
- 93.9
- ESPN rostered
- 14.5%
- Historical board
- 133
Debug / model details
live value 62 vs — retention 74 (-12.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 62.1
- Raw Δ
- -12.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -17.3
- UI fit score
- 32.7
Ignore
Tank Bigsby
RB · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.2
(8.2)
Season
109.7
(150.2)
Value
61
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-18.2
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -40.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -13.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 61.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -13.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -18.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.2
- Season projection
- 109.7
- ESPN rostered
- 17.2%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 61 vs — retention 74 (-13.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 61.3
- Raw Δ
- -13.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -18.2
- UI fit score
- 31.8
Ignore
Braelon Allen
RB · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.6
(8.2)
Season
94.2
(150.2)
Value
59
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-20.4
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -56.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -15.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 59.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -15.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -20.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.6
- Season projection
- 94.2
- ESPN rostered
- 9.0%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 59 vs — retention 74 (-15.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 59.0
- Raw Δ
- -15.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -20.4
- UI fit score
- 29.6
Ignore
MarShawn Lloyd
RB · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
5.0
(8.2)
Season
86.3
(150.2)
Value
58
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-21.0
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -63.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -16.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 58.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -16.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -21.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 5.0
- Season projection
- 86.3
- ESPN rostered
- 8.5%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 58 vs — retention 74 (-16.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 58.5
- Raw Δ
- -16.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -21.0
- UI fit score
- 29.0
Ignore
Austin Ekeler
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
207.8
(150.2)
Value
58
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-21.1
Pros
- Season projection +57.6 versus comparison player
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -16.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 58.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -16.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -21.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 207.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 58 vs — retention 74 (-16.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 58.3
- Raw Δ
- -16.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -21.1
- UI fit score
- 28.9
Ignore
Kendre Miller
RB · 18 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
6.1
(8.2)
Season
80.6
(150.2)
Value
57
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-22.1
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -2.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -69.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -17.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 57.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -17.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -22.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 6.1
- Season projection
- 80.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.5%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 57 vs — retention 74 (-17.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 57.4
- Raw Δ
- -17.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -22.1
- UI fit score
- 27.9
Ignore
Ty Johnson
RB · 2 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
4.6
(8.2)
Season
84.8
(150.2)
Value
56
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-23.2
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -65.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -18.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 56.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -18.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -23.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.6
- Season projection
- 84.8
- ESPN rostered
- 1.3%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 56 vs — retention 74 (-18.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 56.3
- Raw Δ
- -18.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -23.2
- UI fit score
- 26.8
Ignore
Kaleb Johnson
RB · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.3
(8.2)
Season
159.8
(150.2)
Value
56
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-23.3
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -7.9 versus marginal roster slot
- Raw player-value loss of -18.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 56.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -18.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -23.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.3
- Season projection
- 159.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.6%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 56 vs — retention 74 (-18.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 56.2
- Raw Δ
- -18.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -23.3
- UI fit score
- 26.7
Ignore
Najee Harris
RB · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.0
(8.2)
Season
95.0
(150.2)
Value
55
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-24.0
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -55.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -19.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 55.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -19.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -24.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.0
- Season projection
- 95.0
- ESPN rostered
- 3.2%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 55 vs — retention 74 (-19.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 55.4
- Raw Δ
- -19.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -24.0
- UI fit score
- 26.0
Ignore
Mike Washington Jr.
RB · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.9
(8.2)
Season
65.2
(150.2)
Value
55
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-24.7
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -3.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -85.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -19.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 54.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -19.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -24.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.9
- Season projection
- 65.2
- ESPN rostered
- 36.1%
- Historical board
- 140
Debug / model details
live value 55 vs — retention 74 (-19.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 54.7
- Raw Δ
- -19.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -24.7
- UI fit score
- 25.3
Ignore
Jonah Coleman
RB · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
4.1
(8.2)
Season
74.5
(150.2)
Value
54
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-25.2
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -75.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -20.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 54.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -20.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -25.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 4.1
- Season projection
- 74.5
- ESPN rostered
- 10.9%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 54 vs — retention 74 (-20.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 54.3
- Raw Δ
- -20.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -25.2
- UI fit score
- 24.8
Ignore
George Holani
RB · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
6.4
(8.2)
Season
41.5
(150.2)
Value
52
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-27.8
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -1.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -108.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -22.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 51.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -22.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -27.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 6.4
- Season projection
- 41.5
- ESPN rostered
- 2.8%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 52 vs — retention 74 (-22.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile current-week projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 51.6
- Raw Δ
- -22.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -27.8
- UI fit score
- 22.2
Ignore
Ollie Gordon II
RB · 15 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
2.2
(8.2)
Season
84.3
(150.2)
Value
51
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-28.5
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -65.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -23.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 50.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -23.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -28.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.2
- Season projection
- 84.3
- ESPN rostered
- 1.5%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 51 vs — retention 74 (-23.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 50.9
- Raw Δ
- -23.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -28.5
- UI fit score
- 21.5
Ignore
Ray Davis
RB · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.1
(8.2)
Season
81.6
(150.2)
Value
51
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-28.8
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -68.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -23.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 50.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -23.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -28.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.1
- Season projection
- 81.6
- ESPN rostered
- 9.8%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 51 vs — retention 74 (-23.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 50.7
- Raw Δ
- -23.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -28.8
- UI fit score
- 21.2
Ignore
Emari Demercado
RB · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.5
(8.2)
Season
63.8
(150.2)
Value
50
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-29.4
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -4.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -86.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -24.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 50.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -24.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -29.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.5
- Season projection
- 63.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.9%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 50 vs — retention 74 (-24.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 50.1
- Raw Δ
- -24.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -29.4
- UI fit score
- 20.6
Ignore
Kaelon Black
RB · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.1
(8.2)
Season
60.5
(150.2)
Value
50
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-29.8
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -89.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -24.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 49.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -24.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -29.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.1
- Season projection
- 60.5
- ESPN rostered
- 4.7%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 50 vs — retention 74 (-24.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 49.6
- Raw Δ
- -24.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -29.8
- UI fit score
- 20.2
Ignore
Trey Benson
RB · 22 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
128.6
(150.2)
Value
49
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-30.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -21.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -25.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 49.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -25.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -30.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 128.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.4%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 49 vs — retention 74 (-25.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 49.0
- Raw Δ
- -25.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -30.5
- UI fit score
- 19.5
Ignore
Jaydon Blue
RB · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
3.3
(8.2)
Season
54.9
(150.2)
Value
49
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-30.8
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -95.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -25.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 48.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -25.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -30.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.3
- Season projection
- 54.9
- ESPN rostered
- 3.1%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 49 vs — retention 74 (-25.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 48.7
- Raw Δ
- -25.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -30.8
- UI fit score
- 19.2
Ignore
Nick Chubb
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
119.7
(150.2)
Value
47
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-32.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -30.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -27.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 47.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -27.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -32.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 119.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 47 vs — retention 74 (-27.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 47.0
- Raw Δ
- -27.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -32.4
- UI fit score
- 17.6
Ignore
Isaiah Davis
RB · 20 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
3.1
(8.2)
Season
51.0
(150.2)
Value
46
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-33.0
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -99.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -28.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 46.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -28.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -33.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 3.1
- Season projection
- 51.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.8%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 46 vs — retention 74 (-28.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 46.5
- Raw Δ
- -28.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -33.0
- UI fit score
- 17.0
Ignore
Joe Mixon
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
118.1
(150.2)
Value
46
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-33.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -32.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -28.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 46.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -28.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -33.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 118.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 46 vs — retention 74 (-28.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 46.4
- Raw Δ
- -28.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -33.0
- UI fit score
- 17.0
Ignore
LeQuint Allen Jr.
RB · 30 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
2.7
(8.2)
Season
49.5
(150.2)
Value
45
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-34.6
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -100.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -29.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -29.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -34.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.7
- Season projection
- 49.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.7%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 45 vs — retention 74 (-29.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 44.9
- Raw Δ
- -29.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -34.6
- UI fit score
- 15.4
Ignore
Jaylen Wright
RB · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.7
(8.2)
Season
45.4
(150.2)
Value
45
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-34.6
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -104.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -29.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -29.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -34.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.7
- Season projection
- 45.4
- ESPN rostered
- 1.9%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 45 vs — retention 74 (-29.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 44.8
- Raw Δ
- -29.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -34.6
- UI fit score
- 15.4
Ignore
Jerome Ford
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
109.3
(150.2)
Value
45
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-34.7
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -40.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -29.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -29.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -34.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 109.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 45 vs — retention 74 (-29.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 44.7
- Raw Δ
- -29.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -34.7
- UI fit score
- 15.3
Ignore
Emmett Johnson
RB · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.5
(8.2)
Season
46.6
(150.2)
Value
45
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-34.8
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -103.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -29.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -29.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -34.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.5
- Season projection
- 46.6
- ESPN rostered
- 2.8%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 45 vs — retention 74 (-29.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 44.7
- Raw Δ
- -29.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -34.8
- UI fit score
- 15.2
Ignore
Will Shipley
RB · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.7
(8.2)
Season
57.9
(150.2)
Value
44
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-35.3
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.5 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -92.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -30.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 44.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -30.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -35.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.7
- Season projection
- 57.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.6%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 44 vs — retention 74 (-30.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 44.1
- Raw Δ
- -30.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -35.3
- UI fit score
- 14.7
Ignore
Kareem Hunt
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
100.0
(150.2)
Value
43
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-36.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -50.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -31.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 43.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -31.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -36.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 100.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 43 vs — retention 74 (-31.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 43.4
- Raw Δ
- -31.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -36.0
- UI fit score
- 14.0
Ignore
Kyle Juszczyk
RB · 25 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
2.6
(8.2)
Season
44.9
(150.2)
Value
43
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-36.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -5.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -105.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -31.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 43.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -31.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -36.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.6
- Season projection
- 44.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.5%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 43 vs — retention 74 (-31.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 43.3
- Raw Δ
- -31.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -36.2
- UI fit score
- 13.8
Ignore
Kimani Vidal
RB · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.4
(8.2)
Season
36.4
(150.2)
Value
42
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-37.3
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -5.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -113.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -32.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 42.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -32.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -37.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.4
- Season projection
- 36.4
- ESPN rostered
- 2.6%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 42 vs — retention 74 (-32.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 42.2
- Raw Δ
- -32.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -37.3
- UI fit score
- 12.7
Ignore
Sean Tucker
RB · 27 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.2
(8.2)
Season
36.9
(150.2)
Value
42
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-38.0
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -113.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -33.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 41.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -33.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -38.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.2
- Season projection
- 36.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.9%
- Historical board
- 160
Debug / model details
live value 41 vs — retention 74 (-33.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 41.5
- Raw Δ
- -33.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -38.0
- UI fit score
- 12.0
Ignore
Chris Brooks
RB · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
2.1
(8.2)
Season
36.0
(150.2)
Value
40
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-39.2
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -114.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -34.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 40.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -34.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -39.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.1
- Season projection
- 36.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.6%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 40 vs — retention 74 (-34.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 40.3
- Raw Δ
- -34.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -39.2
- UI fit score
- 10.8
Ignore
DJ Giddens
RB · 11 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
2.0
(8.2)
Season
36.0
(150.2)
Value
40
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-39.4
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -114.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -34.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 40.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -34.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -39.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 2.0
- Season projection
- 36.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.7%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 40 vs — retention 74 (-34.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 40.1
- Raw Δ
- -34.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -39.4
- UI fit score
- 10.6
Ignore
Roschon Johnson
RB · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
80.6
(150.2)
Value
39
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-40.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -69.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -35.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 38.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -35.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -40.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 80.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 39 vs — retention 74 (-35.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 38.9
- Raw Δ
- -35.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -40.6
- UI fit score
- 9.4
Ignore
Jordan James
RB · 25 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
1.5
(8.2)
Season
29.2
(150.2)
Value
38
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-41.1
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -121.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -36.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 38.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -36.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -41.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.5
- Season projection
- 29.2
- ESPN rostered
- 3.4%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 38 vs — retention 74 (-36.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 38.4
- Raw Δ
- -36.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -41.1
- UI fit score
- 8.9
Ignore
Emanuel Wilson
RB · 26 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
1.6
(8.2)
Season
32.1
(150.2)
Value
38
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-41.1
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -118.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -36.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 38.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -36.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -41.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.6
- Season projection
- 32.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.8%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 38 vs — retention 74 (-36.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 38.3
- Raw Δ
- -36.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -41.1
- UI fit score
- 8.9
Ignore
Miles Sanders
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
88.6
(150.2)
Value
38
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-41.9
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -61.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -36.9
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 37.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -36.9
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -41.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 88.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 38 vs — retention 74 (-36.9 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 37.6
- Raw Δ
- -36.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -41.9
- UI fit score
- 8.1
Ignore
Phil Mafah
RB · 6 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
1.7
(8.2)
Season
28.2
(150.2)
Value
37
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-42.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -6.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -122.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -37.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 36.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -37.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -42.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.7
- Season projection
- 28.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 37 vs — retention 74 (-37.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 36.6
- Raw Δ
- -37.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -42.8
- UI fit score
- 7.2
Ignore
Adam Randall
RB · 33 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
1.5
(8.2)
Season
25.1
(150.2)
Value
36
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-42.9
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -6.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -125.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -37.9
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 36.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -37.9
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -42.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.5
- Season projection
- 25.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.8%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 37 vs — retention 74 (-37.9 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 36.5
- Raw Δ
- -37.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -42.9
- UI fit score
- 7.1
Ignore
Brashard Smith
RB · 12 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
49.8
(150.2)
Value
36
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-43.3
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -100.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -38.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 36.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -38.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -43.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 49.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 36 vs — retention 74 (-38.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 36.2
- Raw Δ
- -38.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -43.3
- UI fit score
- 6.7
Ignore
Zamir White
RB · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
64.7
(150.2)
Value
35
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-44.1
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -85.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -39.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 35.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -39.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 64.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 35 vs — retention 74 (-39.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 35.4
- Raw Δ
- -39.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.1
- UI fit score
- 5.9
Ignore
Hunter Luepke
RB · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.5
(8.2)
Season
25.0
(150.2)
Value
35
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-44.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -6.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -125.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -39.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 35.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -39.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.5
- Season projection
- 25.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 35 vs — retention 74 (-39.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 35.0
- Raw Δ
- -39.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.4
- UI fit score
- 5.6
Ignore
Trevor Etienne
RB · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
23.7
(150.2)
Value
35
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-44.7
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -7.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -126.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -39.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 34.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -39.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 23.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.7%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 35 vs — retention 74 (-39.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 34.7
- Raw Δ
- -39.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.7
- UI fit score
- 5.3
Ignore
Nicholas Singleton
RB · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.2
(8.2)
Season
19.8
(150.2)
Value
35
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-44.8
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -7.0 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -130.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -39.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 34.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -39.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.2
- Season projection
- 19.8
- ESPN rostered
- 2.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 35 vs — retention 74 (-39.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 34.7
- Raw Δ
- -39.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.8
- UI fit score
- 5.2
Ignore
Devin Neal
RB · 18 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
52.1
(150.2)
Value
35
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-44.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -98.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -39.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 34.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -39.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 52.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 35 vs — retention 74 (-39.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; top-quintile season projection within the live position pool
- Player Value
- 34.6
- Raw Δ
- -39.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -44.8
- UI fit score
- 5.2
Ignore
Tahj Brooks
RB · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.1
(8.2)
Season
19.5
(150.2)
Value
33
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-46.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -130.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 33.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -46.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.1
- Season projection
- 19.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 33.0
- Raw Δ
- -41.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -46.5
- UI fit score
- 3.5
Ignore
Demond Claiborne
RB · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
16.8
(150.2)
Value
33
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-46.7
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -7.3 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -133.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 32.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -46.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 16.8
- ESPN rostered
- 1.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 32.7
- Raw Δ
- -41.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -46.7
- UI fit score
- 3.3
Ignore
Isaac Guerendo
RB · 25 · WAIVERS · OUT
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
33.9
(150.2)
Value
33
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-46.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -116.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: OUT
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 32.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -46.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 33.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.3%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 32.6
- Raw Δ
- -41.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -46.8
- UI fit score
- 3.2
Ignore
Dameon Pierce
RB · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
51.5
(150.2)
Value
32
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-46.9
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -98.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -41.9
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 32.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -41.9
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -46.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 51.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 33 vs — retention 74 (-41.9 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 32.5
- Raw Δ
- -41.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -46.9
- UI fit score
- 3.1
Ignore
Kaytron Allen
RB · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.9
(8.2)
Season
15.7
(150.2)
Value
32
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-47.2
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -7.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -134.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -42.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 32.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -42.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -47.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.9
- Season projection
- 15.7
- ESPN rostered
- 1.8%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 32 vs — retention 74 (-42.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 32.2
- Raw Δ
- -42.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -47.2
- UI fit score
- 2.8
Ignore
Alec Ingold
RB · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
1.0
(8.2)
Season
22.4
(150.2)
Value
32
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-47.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -127.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -42.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 31.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -42.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -47.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 1.0
- Season projection
- 22.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 32 vs — retention 74 (-42.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 31.8
- Raw Δ
- -42.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -47.6
- UI fit score
- 2.4
Ignore
Seth McGowan
RB · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.9
(8.2)
Season
15.7
(150.2)
Value
31
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-48.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.4 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -134.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -43.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 31.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -43.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -48.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.9
- Season projection
- 15.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.4%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 31 vs — retention 74 (-43.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 31.3
- Raw Δ
- -43.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -48.2
- UI fit score
- 1.8
Ignore
Raheem Mostert
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
46.2
(150.2)
Value
31
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-48.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -104.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -43.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 30.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -43.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -48.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 46.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 31 vs — retention 74 (-43.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 30.6
- Raw Δ
- -43.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -48.8
- UI fit score
- 1.2
Ignore
Tyler Badie
RB · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
20.9
(150.2)
Value
29
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-50.7
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -129.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -45.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 28.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -45.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -50.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 20.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 29 vs — retention 74 (-45.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 28.8
- Raw Δ
- -45.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -50.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Devin Singletary
RB · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
20.0
(150.2)
Value
28
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-51.3
Pros
- Strong ESPN ownership/market signal
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -130.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -46.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 28.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -46.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -51.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 20.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.5%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 28 vs — retention 74 (-46.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth; strong ESPN ownership signal
- Player Value
- 28.1
- Raw Δ
- -46.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -51.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Connor Heyward
RB · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.7
(8.2)
Season
10.3
(150.2)
Value
28
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-51.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -139.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -46.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 27.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -46.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -51.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.7
- Season projection
- 10.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 28 vs — retention 74 (-46.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 27.9
- Raw Δ
- -46.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -51.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Adam Prentice
RB · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.6
(8.2)
Season
10.5
(150.2)
Value
27
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-52.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -139.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -47.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 27.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -47.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -52.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.6
- Season projection
- 10.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 27 vs — retention 74 (-47.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 27.0
- Raw Δ
- -47.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -52.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jaleel McLaughlin
RB · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
20.7
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-53.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -129.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -48.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 26.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -48.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -53.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 20.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 26 vs — retention 74 (-48.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 26.0
- Raw Δ
- -48.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -53.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Max Bredeson
RB · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.6
(8.2)
Season
9.6
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-53.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -140.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -48.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 25.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -48.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -53.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.6
- Season projection
- 9.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 26 vs — retention 74 (-48.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 25.9
- Raw Δ
- -48.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -53.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Michael Burton
RB · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.6
(8.2)
Season
10.1
(150.2)
Value
26
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-53.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.6 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -140.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -48.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 25.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -48.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -53.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.6
- Season projection
- 10.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 26 vs — retention 74 (-48.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 25.9
- Raw Δ
- -48.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -53.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Riley Nowakowski
RB · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
8.1
(150.2)
Value
25
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-54.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -142.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 25.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 8.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 25.3
- Raw Δ
- -49.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Andrew Beck
RB · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.5
(8.2)
Season
8.4
(150.2)
Value
25
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-54.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.7 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -141.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 25.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.5
- Season projection
- 8.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 25.0
- Raw Δ
- -49.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Reggie Gilliam
RB · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.4
(8.2)
Season
8.0
(150.2)
Value
25
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-54.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -142.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 24.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.4
- Season projection
- 8.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 24.9
- Raw Δ
- -49.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jawhar Jordan
RB · 34 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.4
(8.2)
Season
6.9
(150.2)
Value
25
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-54.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -143.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 24.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.4
- Season projection
- 6.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 24.9
- Raw Δ
- -49.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Patrick Ricard
RB · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.4
(8.2)
Season
7.4
(150.2)
Value
25
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-54.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -7.8 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -142.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -49.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 24.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -49.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.4
- Season projection
- 7.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 25 vs — retention 74 (-49.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 24.6
- Raw Δ
- -49.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -54.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
AJ Dillon
RB · 29 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
11.2
(150.2)
Value
24
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-55.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -139.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -50.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 23.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -50.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -55.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 11.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 24 vs — retention 74 (-50.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 23.8
- Raw Δ
- -50.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -55.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jeremy McNichols
RB · 28 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
16.9
(150.2)
Value
24
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-55.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -133.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -50.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 23.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -50.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -55.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 16.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 24 vs — retention 74 (-50.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 23.8
- Raw Δ
- -50.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -55.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Bam Knight
RB · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
6.6
(150.2)
Value
24
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-55.9
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -143.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -50.9
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 23.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -50.9
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -55.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 6.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 24 vs — retention 74 (-50.9 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 23.5
- Raw Δ
- -50.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -55.9
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Rasheen Ali
RB · 33 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
7.1
(150.2)
Value
23
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-56.1
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -143.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -51.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 23.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -51.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -56.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 7.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 23 vs — retention 74 (-51.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 23.3
- Raw Δ
- -51.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -56.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kalel Mullings
RB · 10 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
24.4
(150.2)
Value
23
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-56.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -125.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -51.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 23.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -51.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -56.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 24.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 23 vs — retention 74 (-51.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 23.3
- Raw Δ
- -51.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -56.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Julius Chestnut
RB · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
14.3
(150.2)
Value
23
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-56.7
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -136.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -51.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 22.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -51.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -56.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 14.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 23 vs — retention 74 (-51.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 22.8
- Raw Δ
- -51.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -56.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dare Ogunbowale
RB · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
15.7
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-57.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -134.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 22.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -57.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 15.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 22.5
- Raw Δ
- -52.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -57.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kene Nwangwu
RB · 20 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.1
(8.2)
Season
2.3
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-57.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -147.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 22.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -57.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.1
- Season projection
- 2.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 22.0
- Raw Δ
- -52.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -57.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tyler Goodson
RB · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
10.1
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-57.7
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -140.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -57.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 10.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 21.7
- Raw Δ
- -52.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -57.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dylan Laube
RB · 13 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
1.0
(150.2)
Value
22
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-57.9
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -149.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -52.9
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 21.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -52.9
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -57.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 1.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 22 vs — retention 74 (-52.9 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 21.6
- Raw Δ
- -52.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -57.9
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Josh Williams
RB · 27 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
2.6
(150.2)
Value
21
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-58.7
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -147.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -53.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 20.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -53.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -58.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 2.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 21 vs — retention 74 (-53.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 20.8
- Raw Δ
- -53.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -58.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ty Chandler
RB · 18 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
8.7
(150.2)
Value
20
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-59.3
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -141.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -54.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 20.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -54.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 8.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 20 vs — retention 74 (-54.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 20.1
- Raw Δ
- -54.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jacob Saylors
RB · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.3
(150.2)
Value
20
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-59.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -149.9 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -54.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 20.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -54.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.3
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 20 vs — retention 74 (-54.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 20.0
- Raw Δ
- -54.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
British Brooks
RB · 34 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
0.2
(8.2)
Season
2.4
(150.2)
Value
20
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-59.7
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.1 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -147.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -54.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -54.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.2
- Season projection
- 2.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 20 vs — retention 74 (-54.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 19.8
- Raw Δ
- -54.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Antonio Gibson
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
8.9
(150.2)
Value
20
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-59.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -141.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -54.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -54.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 8.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 20 vs — retention 74 (-54.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 19.7
- Raw Δ
- -54.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Damien Martinez
RB · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
8.9
(150.2)
Value
20
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-59.9
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -141.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -54.9
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -54.9
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.9
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 8.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 20 vs — retention 74 (-54.9 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 19.5
- Raw Δ
- -54.9
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -59.9
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Carson Steele
RB · 21 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
6.6
(150.2)
Value
19
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-60.3
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -143.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -55.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -55.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -60.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 6.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 19 vs — retention 74 (-55.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 19.2
- Raw Δ
- -55.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -60.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
DeeJay Dallas
RB · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.2
(150.2)
Value
19
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-60.3
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -55.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 19.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -55.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -60.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 19 vs — retention 74 (-55.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 19.1
- Raw Δ
- -55.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -60.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Nathan Carter
RB · 1 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
9.7
(150.2)
Value
19
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-60.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -140.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -55.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -55.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -60.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 9.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 19 vs — retention 74 (-55.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 18.8
- Raw Δ
- -55.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -60.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jarquez Hunter
RB · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.2
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-61.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.0 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 18.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -61.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.2
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 18.3
- Raw Δ
- -56.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -61.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
C.J. Ham
RB · 16 · WAIVERS
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
6.5
(150.2)
Value
18
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-61.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -143.7 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -56.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.6
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -56.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -61.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 6.5
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 18 vs — retention 74 (-56.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 17.6
- Raw Δ
- -56.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -61.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Hassan Haskins
RB · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
7.6
(150.2)
Value
17
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-62.1
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -142.6 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -57.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -57.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -62.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 7.6
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 17 vs — retention 74 (-57.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 17.4
- Raw Δ
- -57.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -62.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Scott Matlock
RB · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
4.1
(150.2)
Value
17
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-62.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -146.1 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -57.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 17.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -57.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -62.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 4.1
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 17 vs — retention 74 (-57.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 17.1
- Raw Δ
- -57.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -62.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jack Westover
RB · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
4.4
(150.2)
Value
16
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-63.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -145.8 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -58.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 16.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -58.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -63.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 4.4
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 16 vs — retention 74 (-58.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 16.0
- Raw Δ
- -58.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -63.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Craig Reynolds
RB · 28 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
7.8
(150.2)
Value
16
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-63.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -142.4 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -58.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 15.9
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -58.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -63.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 7.8
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 16 vs — retention 74 (-58.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 15.9
- Raw Δ
- -58.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -63.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Velus Jones Jr.
RB · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.7
(150.2)
Value
16
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-63.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -149.5 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -58.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 15.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -58.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.7
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 16 vs — retention 74 (-58.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 15.8
- Raw Δ
- -58.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -63.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Robbie Ouzts
RB · 26 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
3.9
(150.2)
Value
16
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-63.7
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -146.3 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -58.7
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 15.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -58.7
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -63.7
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 3.9
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 16 vs — retention 74 (-58.7 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 15.7
- Raw Δ
- -58.7
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -63.7
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Malik Davis
RB · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
14
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-65.3
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -60.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 14.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -60.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -65.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.4%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 14 vs — retention 74 (-60.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 14.2
- Raw Δ
- -60.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -65.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Israel Abanikanda
RB · 6 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
13
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-66.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -61.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 12.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -61.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -66.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 13 vs — retention 74 (-61.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 12.7
- Raw Δ
- -61.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -66.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ezekiel Elliott
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
12
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-67.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -62.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 12.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 12 vs — retention 74 (-62.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 12.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Frank Gore Jr.
RB · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
12
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-67.5
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -62.5
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 12.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.5
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.5
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 12 vs — retention 74 (-62.5 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 12.0
- Raw Δ
- -62.5
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.5
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jermar Jefferson
RB · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
12
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-67.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -62.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 12 vs — retention 74 (-62.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 11.7
- Raw Δ
- -62.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Audric Estime
RB · 18 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
12
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-67.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -62.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 12 vs — retention 74 (-62.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 11.7
- Raw Δ
- -62.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Michael Carter
RB · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
12
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-67.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -62.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -62.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 12 vs — retention 74 (-62.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 11.7
- Raw Δ
- -62.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -67.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ronnie Rivers
RB · 14 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.1
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 11.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Raheim Sanders
RB · 5 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.1
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 11.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Zavier Scott
RB · 16 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.1
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.1
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 11.4
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.1
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.1
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.1 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 11.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.1
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.1
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dalvin Cook
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.8
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Terrell Jennings
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.8
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Salvon Ahmed
RB · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.8
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ameer Abdullah
RB · 30 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.8
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Pierre Strong Jr.
RB · 9 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.8
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Sione Vaki
RB · 8 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
11
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-68.6
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -63.6
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.8
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 11 vs — retention 74 (-63.6 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.8
- Raw Δ
- -63.6
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -68.6
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Brittain Brown
RB · 3 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-69.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.2
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jacob Kibodi
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-69.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.2
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
DeWayne McBride
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-69.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.2
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Trayveon Williams
RB · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-69.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.2
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Travis Homer
RB · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-69.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.2
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Khalil Herbert
RB · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-69.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.2
- Raw Δ
- -64.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Chris Collier
RB · 13 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
0.0
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-69.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Week projection -8.2 versus marginal roster slot
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -64.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 10.0
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- 0.0
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 10 vs — retention 74 (-64.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 10.0
- Raw Δ
- -64.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -69.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Raheem Blackshear
RB · 8 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Cordarrelle Patterson
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Deuce Vaughn
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
SaRodorick Thompson Jr.
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Gary Brightwell
RB · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Lan Larison
RB · 17 · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
D.J. Williams
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Louis Rees-Zammit
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Sincere McCormick
RB · 25 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jamaal Williams
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Cam Akers
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Clyde Edwards-Helaire
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
10
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-70.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -65.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 9.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 9 vs — retention 74 (-65.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 9.5
- Raw Δ
- -65.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -70.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Eric Gray
RB · 19 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ben VanSumeren
RB · 2 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Corey Kiner
RB · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Brady Russell
RB · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Donovan Edwards
RB · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Trey Sermon
RB · 1 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
D'Ernest Johnson
RB · 10 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jaret Patterson
RB · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Elijah Mitchell
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Lew Nichols
RB · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Gus Edwards
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Aaron Shampklin
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Patrick Taylor Jr.
RB · 25 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Carlos Washington Jr.
RB · 15 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
JaMycal Hasty
RB · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
J.J. Taylor
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Xazavian Valladay
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Cody Schrader
RB · 7 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Zack Moss
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Blake Watson
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Alexander Mattison
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
8
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-71.2
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -66.2
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 8.3
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 8 vs — retention 74 (-66.2 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 8.3
- Raw Δ
- -66.2
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -71.2
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Eli Heidenreich
RB · 23 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.3
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -67.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 7.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.2%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 7.1
- Raw Δ
- -67.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Mike Boone
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kenny McIntosh
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
John Kelly Jr.
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jordan Mims
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Myles Gaskin
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ke'Shawn Vaughn
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Keaontay Ingram
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Troy Hairston
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jeff Wilson Jr.
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
D'Onta Foreman
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Josh Johnson
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tony Jones Jr.
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Darrynton Evans
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Owen Wright
RB · 34 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Deneric Prince
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Keilan Robinson
RB · · WAIVERS · QUESTIONABLE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: QUESTIONABLE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Michael Wiley
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Chase Edmonds
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jakob Johnson
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Evan Hull
RB · 22 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jonathan Ward
RB · 33 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Tyrion Davis-Price
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Nyheim Hines
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Joshua Kelley
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Khari Blasingame
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Kendall Milton
RB · 4 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ellis Merriweather
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Zach Evans
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Dante Miller
RB · 19 · WAIVERS · INJURY_RESERVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Injury/status: INJURY_RESERVE
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jase McClellan
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Elijah Dotson
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Mohamed Ibrahim
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Avery Williams
RB · · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
0.0
(150.2)
Value
7
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-72.8
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Season projection -150.2 versus comparison player
- Raw player-value loss of -67.8
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Weak ESPN ownership/market signal
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.7
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- 0.0
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 7 vs — retention 74 (-67.8 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.7
- Raw Δ
- -67.8
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -72.8
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jam Miller
RB · 17 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
6
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-73.3
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -68.3
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 6.2
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -68.3
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -73.3
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 6 vs — retention 74 (-68.3 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 6.2
- Raw Δ
- -68.3
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -73.3
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Ulysses Bentley IV
RB · 11 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-74.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -69.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -74.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 5.1
- Raw Δ
- -69.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -74.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Jacardia Wright
RB · 26 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
5
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-74.4
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -69.4
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 5.1
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -69.4
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -74.4
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.1%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 5 vs — retention 74 (-69.4 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 5.1
- Raw Δ
- -69.4
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -74.4
- UI fit score
- 0.0
Ignore
Amar Johnson
RB · 24 · WAIVERS · ACTIVE
Week
—
(8.2)
Season
—
(150.2)
Value
2
(74)
Fit
-5.0
Net
-77.0
Pros
- No material positive factors beyond baseline.
Cons
- Raw player-value loss of -72.0
- Existing RB depth reduces the value of another RB
- Net transaction value does not justify a roster move
Decision math
- Incoming value
- 2.5
- Drop retention
- 74.4
- Raw Δ
- -72.0
- Roster fit
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -77.0
- Claim threshold
- +12.0
- Watch threshold
- +3.0
Context
- Drop / swap
- —
- Week projection
- —
- Season projection
- —
- ESPN rostered
- 0.0%
- Historical board
- —
Debug / model details
live value 2 vs — retention 74 (-72.0 before roster-fit adjustment); penalized for existing Longboys RB depth
- Player Value
- 2.5
- Raw Δ
- -72.0
- Roster-fit adjustment
- -5.0
- Net Δ
- -77.0
- UI fit score
- 0.0